中共MBT行進中射擊能力

來源~taiwanbbs.org

-----------------------------------------
請問:

中國的type90II行進射擊,多遠能有效命中貫穿M60A3正面砲塔?相反的我方M60A3TTS,在行進中又是多遠能KO掉對方?

某評論家張XX說過伊拉客T-72 ,要到800米才能有效打中美軍坦克,所以小弟才有中國type90,會不會移動射擊更不精準的疑問.可是對方似乎皮比較厚,我方不就要更近才能擊毀它,到底誰比較強呢= =?


-----------------------------------------
Ａ：

1.gun

The armor piercing capability of a tank round decreases by range, for 105mm rifle gun firing APFSDS ammunition with muzzle velocity of 1,485 meters/second.
Typical Armor Penetration at
500m: 377 mm
1000m: 349 mm
1500m: 322 mm
2000m: 294 mm
3000m: 238 mm

For 125mm smoothbore gun firing APFSDS ammunition with muzzle velocity of 1,680 meters/second.
Typcial Armor Penetration at
500m: 387 mm
1000m: 363 mm
1500m: 330 mm
2000m: 297 mm
3000m: 230 mm

Both weapons have even chance of killing each other at similar ranges.

2.armor

However, Type 90 II has composite armor and M60 did not, which meant Type 90 II has greater chance of survival.

3.autoloader

Type 90 II's gun has to return to a specific elevation for the autoloader to work, while M60 does not have an autoloader its gun can fire in any position.

4.thermal sights

The thermal sights on M60A3 is one of the best, better than the ones on M1 Abrams, whereas Type 90 II doesn't not have that kind of sensor. So, M60 gets to see Type 90 II first and at longer ranges and score a kill first.

5.
The Iraqi War has demostrated that M60 is fairly matched to the T-72, since Type 90-II is pretty much a T-72, both of these tanks are about evenly matched. One have better armor and larger gun, the other has better sights and stabilize gun that enable it to fire first.

6.
"The U.S. Army in Saudi Arabia probably had about 1,900 M1A1 tanks. Its ability to fire reliably when moving at speed over rough ground (because of the stabilized gun mount) gave it a capability that proved valuable in the Gulf. The Abrams tank also has… vision devices that proved effective not only at night, but also in the dust and smoke of Kuwaiti daytime. On average, an Abrams outranged an Iraqi tank by about 1,000 meters."
Norman Friedman, Desert Victory - The War for Kuwait


-----------------------------------------
Ａ：
1. 中國目前的最新銳主力戰車是98／99式，次一級的是96式，85/88/90式已經是十年多前研究的三級品

2. 中國為其新銳主力坦克所開發的最新型125 MM戰車炮與衰竭鈾／鎢合金APFSDS，威力據稱與西方現役主戰車用的一級120 MM戰車炮與APFSDS彈同級，甚至於猶有過之（可在2,000公尺處貫穿800至900公釐滾扎均質裝甲），雖然有人質疑此數據不無灌水之嫌，但是以 M-60A3三四十年前的傳統裝甲設計（正面裝甲最厚處防禦力相當於250至300公釐滾扎均質裝甲），上述穿甲性能哪怕打個五折，照樣足以在2,000 甚至於3,000公尺以外處屠殺M-60．

3. 而98/99式戰車在射控系統與裝甲防禦上，業已大幅捨棄俄製戰車風格，改朝德製戰車設計看齊；根據其複合裝甲配備設計，加上台灣主力戰車上所使用的 105 MM戰車炮與彈種均非時下最尖端的產品，台灣戰車若想正面擊破98/99式戰車，恐怕至少得逼近其至1,000，甚至於500公尺的範圍內方有機會．

簡而言之，如讓陸軍現役主力戰車（CM11, CM12, M-60A3）去與中國新銳主力戰車（96至99式）去正面決戰的話，其下場大概和當年與德軍虎型豹式戰車單挑對抗的75 MM短炮管式M-4薛曼坦克差不多........................


-------------------------------------------
90-II式戦車

行進間射撃性(25km/h以下),1500m命中率70％以上。

-------------------------------------------
98式戦車

行進間射撃性凌駕上述車種

-------------------------------------------
99式戦車

行進間射撃性

2007年美軍將領訪問中国軍基地之際,99式戦車行進間射撃1400m距離目標,APFSDS六發全命中。